<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mompreneurship Ain&#8217;t New (And Could We Cut With the Kumbaya Please?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphawahm.com/wahm-topics/wahm-motivation/mompreneurship-aint-new-and-could-we-cut-with-the-kumbaya-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphawahm.com/wahm-topics/wahm-motivation/mompreneurship-aint-new-and-could-we-cut-with-the-kumbaya-please/</link>
	<description>Empowering Mompreneurs to Live Their Truth, Profitably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 00:00:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://alphawahm.com/wahm-topics/wahm-motivation/mompreneurship-aint-new-and-could-we-cut-with-the-kumbaya-please/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 00:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphawahm.com/?p=575#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t yawning but I was a little sad. On some levels, I think women are self-deprecated if our biology dictates our self-directed accolades. I mean, we agree men are debased if they&#039;re self-congratulatory over their biological prowess so I see momdom as the flipside of the same expression. It&#039;s just so much splintering; first we are human. Then we are daughters. After that we are wives, then mothers (caveats noted). It just seems so transitory ...temporal. We don&#039;t celebrate daughter-dom or wife-dom. This is what it boils down to in a business context; many of the moms I know will have to change their business names/marketing as they age because they&#039;ll outgrow the label. Later will they become grampreneurs? It just strikes me that the human condition is about more than defining ourselves according to a transitional phase of life&#039;s passage. If one&#039;s enterprise is of long term value, then we shouldn&#039;t label ourselves in such a limited fashion. And then, it&#039;s trendy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t yawning but I was a little sad. On some levels, I think women are self-deprecated if our biology dictates our self-directed accolades. I mean, we agree men are debased if they&#8217;re self-congratulatory over their biological prowess so I see momdom as the flipside of the same expression. It&#8217;s just so much splintering; first we are human. Then we are daughters. After that we are wives, then mothers (caveats noted). It just seems so transitory &#8230;temporal. We don&#8217;t celebrate daughter-dom or wife-dom. This is what it boils down to in a business context; many of the moms I know will have to change their business names/marketing as they age because they&#8217;ll outgrow the label. Later will they become grampreneurs? It just strikes me that the human condition is about more than defining ourselves according to a transitional phase of life&#8217;s passage. If one&#8217;s enterprise is of long term value, then we shouldn&#8217;t label ourselves in such a limited fashion. And then, it&#8217;s trendy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
